MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887553894 · doi:10.4236/ti.2018.93010

Research on Innovation Posture of Automated Driving Technology Based on Patentometrics

2018· article· en· W2887553894 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhengang Zhang, Xueyao Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Investment · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInnovation Policy and R&D
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmerging technologiesComputer scienceField (mathematics)FrontierDistribution (mathematics)Multidisciplinary approachData scienceAutomationTechnological changeSoftwareDriving factorsHotspot (geology)Industrial organizationBusinessEngineeringArtificial intelligenceChinaPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an emerging technology that integrates multidisciplinary and multi-technology, Automated Driving is triggering a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, thus attracting the attention of all countries in the world. Based on the Derwent patent database, this paper collects relevant patent information related to Automated Driving from 1998 to 2016 by using software tools such as patent measurement and CiteSpace, and empirically analyzes the temporal distribution, structural distribution, hotspot and frontier technologies, and geographical distribution of automated driving. The study found that automated vehicles have rapidly developing in the past 5 years, which indicates that the technical innovation of automated driving is in an emerging stage. There are geographical differences in innovative activities and capabilities in the field of automated driving. The United States has the absolute competitive advantages, while each country has different technological innovation capabilities in different technical fields. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions of our country to develop the technology and industry of automated driving in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0380.049
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology and InvestmentSame topicInnovation Policy and R&DFrench-language works237,207