MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887568941 · doi:10.1080/10168664.2018.1461535

Explicit Vibration Formulas Applicable to Timber Plates with Free and Simply Supported Edges

2018· article· en· W2887568941 on OpenAlexafffund
Ebenezer Ussher, Kaveh Arjomandi, Ian F. C. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Engineering International · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of FrederictonUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthotropic materialAntisymmetric relationVibrationStructural engineeringFinite element methodSlabSeries (stratigraphy)Matrix (chemical analysis)Cross laminated timberComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsGeologyMaterials scienceAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in research and development have led to the application of high-strength timber plates to flooring-slab construction. It is envisaged that floors built from timber plates will have different vibration behavior from conventional joisted floors. In this paper, explicit formulas are developed based on a matrix formulation that links both the symmetric and antisymmetric vibration modes of orthotropic plates. The developed solution can be used for the dynamic analyses of orthotropic timber floor slabs. The solution presented in this paper overcomes limitations associated with previous solutions by eliminating the need for approximate series expansions for solving the characteristic equations. Its application is demonstrated by considering responses of plates with all or two simply supported edges. The new solutions agree closely with classical and Finite-Element Method (FEM) solutions, as well as with the experimental results for Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) plates. The advantage of the new approach versus alternatives is a combination of accuracy and computational efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural Engineering InternationalSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207