MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887685933 · doi:10.1002/aocs.12104

Plant RuBisCo: An Underutilized Protein for Food Applications

2018· article· en· W2887685933 on OpenAlexafffund
Elisa Di Stefano, Dominic Agyei, Emmanuel N. Njoku, Chibuike C. Udenigwe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRuBisCOAgricultureBiotechnologyChemistryFood scienceBiologyBusinessAgronomyBotanyBiochemistryPhotosynthesisEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Malnutrition is a public health concern and chronic protein malnutrition is prevalent in early childhood in many developing countries. Plant proteins are good candidates for meeting the growing protein needs. RuBisCo (ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) is a photosynthetic enzyme that exists in 4 forms (I, II, III, and IV), with form I being characteristic of higher plants. Form I RuBisCo represents 50% of leaf proteins, and is, therefore, important as a source of protein for nutrition and as a functional ingredient, although the laborious extraction process for plant proteins can limit their use in food products. Column chromatography is the most effective RuBisCo purification step for laboratory research, while ultrafiltration has shown prospects for large‐scale applications. RuBisCo has excellent solubility in alkaline pH and at low denaturation temperatures. Thus, RuBisCo can form brittle gels at low concentrations, which can influence the chemosensory properties of products containing the proteins. Foaming of RuBisCo occurs around its isoelectric point, while emulsifying capacity proportionally increases with pH. Heating prior to emulsification increased the strength and stability of emulsion formed with RuBisCo. The protein is also attractive due to its high nutritional values and in vitro digestibility. Furthermore, RuBisCo is a competitive source of bioactive peptides with opioid‐like, memory‐enhancing, appetite‐stimulating, antioxidative, and antihypertensive properties, demonstrating the wide range of food applications where RuBisCo can be utilized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations105
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207