Inward- and outward-facing homology modeling of human concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 (hCNT3) predicts an elevator-type transport mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human SLC28 family of concentrative (Na+-dependent) nucleoside transporters has three members, hCNT1, hCNT2 and hCNT3. Previously, we have used heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes in combination with an engineered cysteine-less hCNT3 protein hCNT3(C-) to undertake systematic substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) analysis of the transporter using the membrane-impermeant thiol reactive reagent p-chloromercuribenzene sulfonate (PCMBS). A continuous sequence of more than 300 individual amino acid residue positions were investigated, including the entire transport domain of the protein, as well as important elements of the corresponding hCNT3 structural domain. We have now constructed 3D structural homology models of hCNT3 based upon inward-facing, intermediates and outward-facing crystal structures of the bacterial CNT Neisseria wadsworthii CNTNW to show that all previously identified PCMBS-sensitive residues in hCNT3 are located above (ie on the extracellular side of) the key diagonal barrier scaffold domain TM9 in the transporter’s outward-facing conformation. In addition, both the Na+ and permeant binding sites of the mobile transport domain of hCNT3 are elevated from below the scaffold domain TM9 in the inward-facing conformation to above TM9 in the outward-facing conformation. The hCNT3 homology models generated in the present study validate our previously published PCMBS SCAM data, and confirm an elevator-type mechanism of membrane transport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".