MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887716613 · doi:10.1117/12.2513168

Learning from our neighbours: a novel approach on sinogram completion using bin-sharing and deep learning to reconstruct high quality 4DCBCT

2019· preprint· en· W2887716613 on OpenAlexaff
Joel Beaudry, Pedro L. Esquinas

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaLakeridge HealthUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Sydney
KeywordsGround truthArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceDeep learningInterpolation (computer graphics)Mean squared errorConvolutional neural networkStreakCentroidImage qualitySimilarity (geometry)BinNoise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Standard deviationComputer visionAlgorithmMathematicsImage (mathematics)StatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by the success of deep learning applications on restoration of low-dose and sparse CT images, we propose a novel method to reconstruct high-quality 4D cone-beam CT (4DCBCT) images from sparse datasets. Our approach combines the idea of bin-sharing with a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model. More specifically, for each respiratory bin, an initial estimate of the patient sinogram is obtained by taking projections from adjacent bins and performing linear interpolation. Subsequently, the estimated sinogram is propagated through a CNN that predicts a full, high-quality sinogram. Lastly, the predicted sinogram is reconstructed with an iterative CBCT algorithms such as the Conjugate Gradient (CG) method. The CNN model, which we referred to as the Sino-Net, was trained under different loss functions. We assessed the performance of the proposed method in terms of image quality metrics (mean square error, mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity) and tumor motion accuracy (tumor centroid deviation with respect to the ground truth). Lastly, we compared our approach against other state-of-the-art methods that compensate motion and reconstruct 4DCBCTs. Overall, the presented prototype model was able to substantially improve the quality of 4DCBCT images, removing most of the streak artifacts and decreasing the noise with respect to the standard CG reconstructions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical ImagingSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207