Long-term outcomes of patients with Takayasu arteritis and renal artery involvement: a cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term outcomes of patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and renal artery involvement (RAI). METHODS: A retrospective review of 122 patients with TAK at three tertiary centres in Canada, Sweden and the UK. Data on demographics, laboratory and clinical parameters, medications and angiography findings were collected. Non-renal and renal parameters were compared at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: . Five underwent endovascular intervention and three required surgical interventions. Among the 33 patients with radiologic follow-up, 23 (69%) had persistent RAI and 10 (30%) had resolution of RAI. One (6%) patient with unilateral RAI developed bilateral RAI and three (19%) with bilateral RAI regressed to unilateral RAI. Over time, 23 (62%) patients had stable renal function, 7 (19%) had improvement and 4 had a decline in renal function; no patient developed end-stage renal disease (ESRD). CONCLUSION: In this series of TAK patients with RAI, long-term non-renal and renal outcomes were favourable. No patient experienced ESRD or died.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".