MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887849338 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002844

Prognostic Factors Associated With Bone Lymphoma Primarily Presenting in the Spine

2018· article· en· W2887849338 on OpenAlexaff
Yufu Wang, Jing Li, Rongzhi Wei, Chao Liu, Andrew Nataraj, Jinglong Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSPINE (molecular biology)LymphomaSurgeryInternal medicineBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic indicators in patients with bone lymphoma of the spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To date, prognosis for patients with spinal bone lymphoma is based on results from small series. Large population-based observational studies are lacking. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry was used to identify all patients with bone lymphoma of the spine from 1995 through 2014. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared across groups using log-rank test. Association of survival with variables was assessed using Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. Nomograms were established and validated by R software. RESULTS: A total of 1338 patients were identified with bone lymphoma of the spine. The trend of incidence was relative steady from 1995 to 2014. The mean and median age of diagnosis was 62.9 and 66.0 years, respectively. Men constituted a slightly greater proportion (55.5%) of the cohort. The most common subtype of lymphoma was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (59.8%). The 5- and 10-year OS rates for those patients were 60.6% and 44.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, sex, marital status, and race were sociodemographic predictors of OS and DSS. Extracompartmental invasion of tumor and stage IV of lymphoma were significantly correlated with poor OS and DSS. Patients without surgery or radiotherapy was linked to a poor OS. Both OS and DSS of patients with spinal bone lymphoma improved in 2005 to 2014 when compared to 1995 to 2004. In addition, pretreatment nomograms to predict 5- and 10-year survival were established. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide population-based estimates of the prognosis for patients with spinal bone lymphoma. Both sociodemographic and clinical factors may have an impact on the outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207