MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887959252 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2018-0049

Geological interpretation of the northern flank of the Matagami camp, Quebec, using gravity and magnetic inversions

2018· article· en· W2887959252 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Thibaut Astic, Michel Chouteau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAnticlineFlankMagnetic anomalyGeophysicsVolcanoOutcropProspectivity mappingMaficInversion (geology)Gravity anomalySeismologyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The northern flank of the Galine anticline of the Matagami camp has been well known for decades for hosting polymetallic VMS deposits (mostly copper and zinc). In such an already explored area, sophisticated exploration tools must be used in the hope of generating new information. By integrating geophysical, petrophysical, and geological data into a three-dimensional (3D) common earth model to constrain gravity and magnetic inversions, our objective was to validate and improve the geological interpretations of the area and to highlight geophysical anomalies unexplained in the current geological model. Both 3D magnetic and gravity data inversions confirm the surface geometry and the steep dip of the geological units. The inverted gravity models indicate that units observable at the surface of the northern flank extend subvertically to several kilometres in depth. The pyroxenitic phase of the Bell River Complex is most certainly dipping steeply to the south, contrary to some surface measurements. The Olga pluton shows no significant decrease in width at depth, with the exception of the west end, which appears to be an apophysis. A major unknown mass, which may correspond to a synvolcanic mafic intrusion that is not outcropping, is revealed in the Allard River volcanic rocks. This improved geophysical model featuring geometrical constraints obtained by careful processing and inversion of the potential-fields data could contribute to new exploration targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207