Effect of long-term lifestyle intervention on mild cognitive impairment in hypertensive occupational population in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of hypertension in China is high, which seriously affects people's health, including occupational population in mining areas. Cognitive dysfunction has a serious impact on the work and life of patients. Lifestyle intervention can improve diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. However, there are few studies on the effects of lifestyle interventions on cognitive function in hypertensive patients. So the aim of this study was to analyze the effect of long-term lifestyle intervention on mild cognitive impairment in hypertensive occupational population in China. METHODS: In September 2013, a cluster sampling was conducted for the workers in the Shaanxi Jinduicheng (intervention group) and Hancheng (control group) mining areas. In both groups, according to the blood pressure (BP) level, they were divided into hypertension stage 1 to 3 subgroups; according to their age, they were divided into between 45 and 59 and under 45 years subgroups; and according to whether or not taking medicine, they were divided into Lifestyle intervention, Lifestyle intervention plus medication, Medication, and No lifestyle intervention nor medication subgroups. The intervention group received regular lifestyle intervention for 2 years, which included diet, smoke, drink, and exercise intervention. Mild cognitive impairment was measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The arterial stiffness was measured by Omron Automatic Atherosclerosis Tester. We conducted BP measurement and MoCA questionnaire at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 510 mine workers, whose average age was 45.6 ± 13.4 years old. With the increase of BP level, the MoCA scores decreased significantly both in control and lifestyle intervention groups (P < .05). There was no obvious difference between the hypertensive patients whose age was between 45 and 59 to those under 45 in MoCA scores (P > .05). After 2 years, the BP, total cholesterol, glucose, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity of the Lifestyle intervention subgroup and Lifestyle intervention plus medication subgroup decreased (P < .05), and the MoCA scores and ankle-brachial index increased (P < .05), and the latter improved more significantly. Compared with the No lifestyle intervention nor medication subgroup, the BP and MoCA scores had no obvious changes at 6 months (P > .05), but the BP decreased and the MoCA scores increased significantly in the Lifestyle intervention and Lifestyle intervention plus medication subgroups after 1 and 2 years of lifestyle intervention (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Long-term lifestyle intervention can be used as adjunctive therapy to improve the BP and cognitive function of hypertensive occupational population in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".