MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888030986 · doi:10.2134/jeq2016.10.0391

Potential Efficiency of Grassy or Shrub Willow Buffer Strips against Nutrient Runoff from Soybean and Corn Fields in Southern Quebec, Canada

2018· article· en· W2888030986 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Louise Hénault-Éthier, Marc Lucotte, Élise Smedbol, Marcelo Pedrosa Gomes, Sophie Maccario, Marie Eve Lamoureux Laprise, Rachel Perron, Marie Larocque, Laurent Lepage, Philippe Juneau, Michel Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Quality · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWillowBuffer stripShrubNutrientSurface runoffAgronomyEnvironmental scienceAgroforestryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Riparian buffer strips (RBS) are encouraged to control agricultural diffuse pollution. In Quebec Province, Canada, a policy promotes 3‐m‐wide RBS. Abiding farmers minimally maintain herbaceous vegetation, but nutrient retention efficiency could be improved with woody biomass. This work aimed to assess if fast‐growing willows ( Salix miyabeana Seemen ‘SX64’) could reduce nutrient loads to a stream, in addition to yielding biomass. Triplicate treatments of two Salix stem densities and a herbaceous control plot were monitored from 2011 to 2013 in a randomized block design on agricultural fields of the St. Lawrence Lowlands with sandy loam (Saint‐Roch‐de‐l’Achigan [SR]) and organic‐rich (Boisbriand [BB]) soils. Runoff, interstitial water, and water from the saturated zone were sampled 16 (SR) and 14 (BB) times to quantify nutrient buffering (NO 3 − , NH 4 + , P, and K). Sampling campaigns followed (i) snowmelt or ≥15‐mm natural precipitation events after (ii) fertilization and (iii) glyphosate‐based herbicide applications. Concentration reduction before and after the RBS was highest for nitrates (77–81% in runoff at BB, 92–98% at 35‐ to 70‐cm depth at SR) just after fertilization, when edge‐of‐field concentrations peaked. Total P removal was observed in runoff after fertilization at SR, and K removal was punctually witnessed at BB. Riparian buffer strips were inefficient for NH 4 and dissolved P removal, and RBS effluents exceeded aquatic life protection standards. Salix plantations, irrespective of stem density, were not more efficient than herbaceous RBS. This shows that without fertilizer input reductions, narrow RBS are insufficient to protect streams from excess nutrients in corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] crops. Core Ideas Riparian buffer strips (RBS) are promoted worldwide to preserve water quality. Narrow RBS are commonly planted with herbaceous vegetation. Salix RBS could play a dual role: water filtration and biomass production. Narrow RBS remove some NO 3 2− and total P and K, not dissolved P and NH 4 + . Herbaceous and Salix RBS are equivalent in filtering diffuse nutrients from row crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental QualitySame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207