MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16098: Mechanism of Branch Pulmonary Artery Stenosis After the Arterial Switch Operation

2015· article· en· W2888046383 on OpenAlexaff
Conall T. Morgan, Luc Mertens, Heynric B. Grotenhuis, Shi‐Joon Yoo, Mike Seed, Lars Grosse‐Wortmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStenosisAscending aortaCardiologyLeft pulmonary arteryInternal medicineCoronal planeAortaRight pulmonary arteryPulmonary arteryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Branch pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis, most commonly on the left, is a recognized postoperative complication of the arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries. We hypothesized that greater rightward rotation of the neopulmonary root and dilation of the ascending aorta are associated with stenosis of the left PA (LPA). Methods: This study represents a retrospective analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) studies performed in patients after ASO. Neo-pulmonary root position in relation to the aorta was expressed as an angle, with a negative angle implying a rightward neo-pulmonary root. For the purpose of this study, perfusion imbalance was defined as <40% of pulmonary blood flow to the affected lung. The offset between the LPA and right PA (RPA) as a result of cranial displacement of the LPA by asymmetric aortic root dilation was measured in the coronal plane. Results: 74 patients / studies were included for analysis. 73% had no branch PA stenosis, 24% had LPA stenosis and 3% had RPA stenosis. LPA area indexed to BSA was smaller than RPA area (287 ± 185mm2 vs 151 ± 114mm2, p=0.001). Smaller LPA area correlated with reduced LPA flow (r=0.213, p=0.0001) and a greater rightward positioning of the neopulmonary to aortic root (r=0.361, p=0.002). There was no correlation between LPA size or flow and offset of the LPA take-off due to an enlarged aortic root. Patients with reduced relative LPA flow were more likely to have required pulmonary arterioplasty with the primary repair (17% vs 2%, p=0.04), had a smaller LPA area [102±102mm2 vs 160±108mm2, p=0.04) and a smaller anterior-posterior thoracic diameter (101±53mm vs 131±55mm, p=0.04). There was no significant difference in patient demographics, cardiac diagnosis, age at operation, aortic root dimension, ventricular volumetrics or ventricular function between patients with normal LPA flow vs. reduced LPA flow. Patients with reduced LPA flow did not have greater peak gradients on echo. Conclusions: Greater rightward rotation of the neopulmonary root is associated with reduced LPA size and likely contributes to the development of LPA stenosis after ASO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→