Molecular simulation of the high temperature phase behaviour of α-unsubstituted sexithiophene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine the high-temperature phase behaviour of α-unsubstituted sexithiophene (α-6T) by means of Molecular Dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using a recently developed state-of-the-art algorithm based on internal bridging moves. In the MD simulations, a realistic fully flexible united-atom model is used. In the MC simulations, a stiffer version of this united-atom model is implemented by restricting atoms on thiophene rings to remain strictly co-planar by employing holonomic constraints for all bond lengths and intra-ring bond bending angles; on the other hand, inter-ring torsion and bond bending angles are considered to be fully flexible subject to suitable potential energy functions. The MD simulations, which are started from the isotropic (Iso) phase at a relatively high temperature (above 700 K) and continued to lower temperatures under isobaric conditions using a very large simulation cell containing 8960 α-6T molecules, show four phase transitions: an isotropic-to-nematic (Iso-to-Nem) at 640 K, a nematic-to-smectic A (Nem-to-SmA) at 630 K, a smectic A-to-smectic C (SmA-to-SmC) at 620 K demonstrating smectic polymorphism, and a SmC-to-crystal-like (SmC-to-Cry) at 600 K. In the corresponding MC simulations, no Nem phase is observed; the system, as it is isobarically cooled down to lower temperatures from its Iso phase, undergoes directly a transition to a SmC phase at 690 K. This is attributed to the stiffer nature of the forcefield employed in these simulations. Both methods (MD and MC) shed light on the type and degree of molecular self-assembly, orientational and positional ordering as a function of temperature, and manifestation of liquid crystalline behaviour of α-6T. We provide a thorough characterization of structural ordering in all mesophases observed, in terms of several measures (radial correlation functions, orientational order parameters and X-ray diffraction patterns). According to the results, at the phase transition temperatures, drastic configurational changes take place driving α-6T molecules to positionally-ordered phases accompanied by self-assembly into characteristic layers which, in turn, are self-organized into macroscopic smectic phases. Our methodology opens up the way to exploring the rich phase behaviour and anisotropic ordering of the condensed phases of several longer (and perhaps more complex) thiophene-based polymers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".