Impact of abnormal longitudinal rotation on the assessment of right ventricular systolic function in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of right ventricular (RV) function plays an important role in patients with cardiopulmonary disease, and current guidelines recommend parameters including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and right ventricular systolic excursion velocity (RVS') to assess RV longitudinal function. We assessed the hypothesis that the previously undescribed motion of RV longitudinal rotation (RVLR) is an independent predictor of both TAPSE and RVS'. METHODS: We assessed a series of 100 consecutive patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing echocardiography. Patients with left ventricular (LV) dilation and dysfunction were excluded. Standard RV parameters were determined using established guidelines, while RVLR and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) measurements were performed using 2-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking technique. RESULTS: Mean peak RVLR measured -4.2±3.7 degrees. By convention, negative values implied clockwise motion. In a multiple linear regression model, TAPSE could be predicted from a combination of RVLR and RVGLS (R=0.56, P<0.001). A similar relationship was found for RVS' which could also be predicted from a combination of RVLR and RVGLS (R=0.52, P<0.001). While no association was found between RVLR and RV size, estimated RV systolic pressure (RVSP) or the presence of a pericardial effusion, a mild correlation was noted between RVLR and QRS duration (R=0.25, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: RVLR is an independent predictor of TAPSE and RVS'. Awareness of this motion should be considered in the interpretation of TAPSE and RVS' values as markers of RV systolic function, as abnormal RVLR may account for exaggerated values, particularly in patients with PH and RV dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".