Urine inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase and changes in kidney structure in early diabetic kidney disease in type 1 diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the association of urine inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IPP2K) with the presence and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) lesions. Urine IPP2K was measured at baseline by quantitative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in 215 participants from the Renin-Angiotensin System Study who had type 1 diabetes and were normoalbuminuric and normotensive with normal or increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Urine IPP2K was detectable in 166 participants. Participants with IPP2K below the limit of quantification (LOQ) were assigned concentrations of LOQ/√2. All concentrations were then standardized to urine creatinine (Cr) concentration. Kidney morphometric data were available from biopsies at baseline and after 5 yr. Relationships of IPP2K/Cr with morphometric variables were assessed by linear regression after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, mean arterial pressure, treatment assignment, and, for longitudinal analyses, baseline structure. Baseline mean age was 29.7 yr, mean diabetes duration 11.2 yr, median albumin excretion rate 5.0 μg/min, and mean iohexol GFR 129 ml·min−1·1.73m−2. Higher IPP2K/Cr was associated with higher baseline peripheral glomerular total filtration surface density [Sv(PGBM/glom), tertile 3 vs. tertile 1 β = 0.527, P = 0.011] and with greater preservation of Sv(PGBM/glom) after 5 yr ( tertile 3 vs. tertile 1 β = 0.317, P = 0.013). Smaller increases in mesangial fractional volume ( tertile 3 vs. tertile 1 β = −0.578, P = 0.018) were observed after 5 yr in men with higher urine IPP2K/Cr concentrations. Higher urine IPP2K/Cr is associated with less severe kidney lesions at baseline and with preservation of kidney structure over 5 yr in individuals with type 1 diabetes and no clinical evidence of DKD at baseline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".