MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888297957 · doi:10.1177/1078155218792985

Evaluation of laboratory disturbance risk when adding low-dose cotrimoxazole for PJP prophylaxis to regimens of high-grade glioma patients taking RAAS inhibitors

2018· article· en· W2888297957 on OpenAlexaff
Roland Coppens, Johanna Yang, Sunita Ghosh, M. John Gill, Carole Chambers, Jacob C. Easaw

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenin–angiotensin systemInternal medicineAldosteroneEndocrinologyUrologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Cotrimoxazole is associated with the development of hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and elevated serum creatinine, especially when combined with inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis is the standard of care for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients receiving temozolomide concurrently with radiotherapy, low-dose cotrimoxazole being the preferred agent. Many of these patients are also taking renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, however the risk of significant laboratory disturbance in these patients remains undescribed. Objective We evaluated whether high-grade glioma patients taking renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors receiving low-dose cotrimoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis are at additional risk of laboratory disturbances in comparison with their non-renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system counterparts. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult neuro-oncology patients treated for WHO Grade III or IV glioma between 2013 and 2016. Patient serum Na, K, creatinine, and eGFR were compared (renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system vs. non-renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system) using the chi-square test. Binary logistic regression analysis was then performed to account for differences between cohorts. Results Of 63 patients (35 non-renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, 28 renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system), patients in the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system cohort were more likely to experience a laboratory disturbance (odds ratio=3.17, p = 0.03). Overall, these disturbances were moderate, but were slightly more common and slightly more severe in the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system cohort. Conclusion Adding low-dose cotrimoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis to the regimens of patients with high-grade glioma taking renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors increases the risk of laboratory disturbances. While these are generally moderate, some patients are at risk of significant electrolyte abnormalities requiring intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Oncology Pharmacy PracticeSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207