ANALISIS ANGGARAN KAS SEBAGAI ALAT PERENCANAN DAN PENGENDALIAN KAS PADA PT PELABUHAN INDONESIA IV CABANG BITUNG
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PT Pelabuhan Indonesia IV Branch Bitung uses the cash budget as their management tool, for the planning and control of the company's cash in achieving the success of the objectives to be achieved by the company. The purpose of this research is to know how cash budget as a planning and control tools cash in PT Pelabuhan Indonesia IV Branch Bitung with observation period of cash budget in 2015, 2016, and 2017. In this research, using descriptive method by collecting information from research result then analyze and draw conclusion from research, method of collecting information in this research by direct interview with finance section about process of preparing cash budget. The results show that the cash budgeting process in PT Pelabuhan Indonesia IV Branch Bitung uses a buttom up budgeting approach where the budget is prepared and prepared by the parties who will implement the budget. The causes of the difference (variance) between the budget and the realization of the cash budget are internal and external factors of the firm. Planning the cash budget by estimating the cost and analysis of the company's activities and for controlling its cash budget in the form of control over good deviations is favorable or unfavorable as well as revisions to deviations that occur.Keywords: Cash Budget, Planning, Controlling
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it