MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2888476066 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2018-0049

Scots pine provenance affects the emission rate and chemical composition of volatile organic compounds of forest floor

2018· article· en· W2888476066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Minna Kivimäenpää, Juha-Matti Markkanen, Rajendra P. Ghimire, Toini Holopainen, Martti Vuorinen, Jarmo K. Holopainen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScots pineForest floorCampheneSabineneEnvironmental scienceProvenanceBotanyHorticultureForestryLimoneneBiologyEcologyPinus <genus>EcosystemGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) is an important source of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) in the boreal zone. BVOC emission rate and profile affect air quality, climate forcing, plant stress tolerance, and thus the growing conditions of forests. BVOC emission profile of shoots and forest floor, as well as emission rates from forest floor, were studied in a latitudinal provenance experiment with 19-year-old Scots pine common garden in Central Finland. The provenances studied were Saaremaa (SAA, 58°22′), Korpilahti (KOR, 62°0′), Suomussalmi (SUO, 65°10′), and Muonio (MUO, 67°56′). A chemotype with high proportion of Δ-3-carene, terpinolene, sabinene, γ-terpinene, and α-terpinene was significantly more common for the southern SAA than the northern SUO and MUO provenances. A chemotype with high proportion of α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, and myrcene was more common in the three northernmost provenances. The main compounds emitted by forest floor were α-pinene, Δ-3-carene, and camphene. Similarly to shoot emissions, forest floor emissions from SAA had highest proportion of Δ-3-carene. Average total VOC emission rate from forest floor was 50 μg·m−2·h−1 at the end of August. Total emission rates were 65% higher in KOR than in MUO. High emission rates were explained by the high amount of decomposing needle litter and low moss coverage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest Research→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→