MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888483650 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2018-0027

Climatic niche modeling reveals divergence between cytotypes in <i>Eutrema edwardsii</i> (Brassicaceae)

2018· article· en· W2888483650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jared E. Mastin, Peter Anthamatten, Léo P. Bruederle

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMuseum of the North, University of AlaskaU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceFlorida Museum of Natural History
KeywordsBiologyNichePolyploidBrassicaceaeEcological nicheEnvironmental niche modellingHerbariumPloidyGene flowEcologyEvolutionary biologyBotanyHabitatGenetic variationGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyploidy among plants is most frequent in the arctic, where glaciation cycles put selective pressures on populations by repeated fragmentation and fluctuation in climate. Polyploids should have been more fit in the novel habitats created as glaciers receded because of increased genetic material and novel gene products, which results in phenotypic plasticity and rapid adaptation. Higher ploidy is then expected to confer a broader tolerance of environmental conditions. Eutrema edwardsii R. Br. (Brassicaceae) is an arctic-alpine mustard with a near circumpolar distribution that occurs as a tetraploid, hexaploid, and octaploid. We used flow cytometry to document the distribution of polyploid cytotypes using herbarium tissue, and modeled the niche of each cytotype to test for niche differentiation. Flow cytometry revealed four cytotypes among 85 individuals. Notably, 60% of the herbarium tissue assays were successful using tissue up to 50 years old. Principle components analysis was performed on 20 climatic variables, of which, the first four axes were used as environmental variables for niche modeling. Niche models were created for tetraploid and hexaploid populations and used to calculate niche overlap (Shoener’s D). Overlap between tetraploid and hexaploid models (D = 0.534) is lower than the null distribution (D = 0.681–0.944) supporting the hypothesis of niche divergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207