MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888670791 · doi:10.15562/gnc.62

CRISPR as a Versatile Technology for Gene Activation and Genome Editing

2018· article· en· W2888670791 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Habib Rezanejadbardeji, Bahareh Behroozi-Asl, Raheleh Amirkhah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Genes and Cells · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCRISPRGenome editingZinc finger nucleaseTranscription activator-like effector nucleaseCas9BiologyGeneGenome engineeringComputational biologyGenomeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CRISPR/Cas system, a microbial adaptive immune system, has rapidly transformed the ways researchers can interrogate the genome. CRISPR has many advantages over traditional methods such as Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) and Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFN). Since CRISPR discovery as an adaptive immune system used by bacterial against viruses, it has been repurposed to help in many different genome-related studies such as gene knocking in and out, gene expression upregulation and downregulation. Also CRISPR holds vast therapeutic potential for the management of genetic disorders by straight modifying disease-causing mutations. Although the Cas9 protein has been revealed to attach and cleave DNA at off-target sites, the field of Cas9 specificity is quickly progressing, with marked modifying in guide RNA choice, protein and guide engineering, innovative enzymes, and off-target recognition methods. In current review we mostly focus on CRISPR unique ability in gene activation/ upregulation, which has wide applications in different aspects such as gene studies, stem cell differentiation, and trans-differentiation. Compared to other gene activation methods such as viral gene overexpression, TALEN and ZFN, CRISPR offers many benefits such as easy designing and high precision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Genes and CellsSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207