Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Westerner's Reflections on LeadershipIt always amazes me how I can still learn so much about something I thought I already knew a great deal about.In this case, the topic was women nurses as leaders.Yet, when I became involved in the Asian Women's Leadership Workshop (AWLW) in 2017 and worked with 12 nursing leaders from five different countries to develop an emerging theory of leadership, I realized once more how much I had to learn.I came to the AWLW armed with my knowledge of a variety of leadership frameworks from different disciplines, many of which I have used to make sense of my professional and personal experiences as a woman and a leader in the profession of nursing.I also brought some limited understanding, based on years of experience working with nurse leaders in several different countries, of how one's culture shapes how one interacts with others, how we set expectations of ourselves and others, and how we as women view our responsibilities.What I did not realize, or more importantly, appreciate, is how the culture one grows up in deeply influences so many things about us as women.Our culture influences the professions we choose, how we balance home and work, how we think and communicate, and how we evaluate our own effectiveness and success as a leader.As a woman raised, educated, and working in the United States, and a nurse for the past 40 years, I was shaped predominately by other women who came from middle class backgrounds, who were often one of the first college educated women in their families.Most were nurse leaders.These women learned how to be a professional leader from men as well as women.With their help and support, I realized I had to "figure out" the rules of power and persuasion and how to negotiate for resources-both individual and collective-in a man's world.The purpose of this article is to share my own leadership experience as a White middle-class woman in a woman-dominated discipline in the multi-ethnic United States society.I reflect on similarities and differences between my own leadership experience and that of other women leaders' experiences through the AWLW.As an epilogue for this special issue, I West Meets East: A Westerner's Reflections on Leadership
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".