Mass normalized mode shape identification of bridge structures using a single actuator-sensor pair
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying mode shapes of bridge structures typically require a dense array of stationary sensors to accurately capture mode shapes with appropriate spatial resolution. An alternative approach is developed here, which requires only a single pair of actuator and sensor. The mode shape identification involves, first, identifying the natural frequencies and modal damping ratios, followed by an estimation of the mass normalized mode shapes components at the excited and measured degrees of freedom. An input–output balance is employed with a series of inputs and outputs obtained from a sequence of tests. The sequence of tests include exciting and measuring at different locations along the bridge, using either a roving actuator and/or a roving sensor; the requirement for a unique identification is that the roving actuator and sensor must be collocated in at least one of the tests. The performance of the proposed method using different types of responses, namely, displacement, velocity, and acceleration, is assessed using numerical simulations. The effect of different types of errors in the identification process is also studied. The method is finally applied to experimental data obtained from laboratory scale tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it