MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P3806The cardiac hemodynamic effects of yoga and it's constituent parts as an adjunct to standard cardiac rehabilitation

2018· article· en· W2888796849 on OpenAlexaff
A. Shekhar Pandey

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsCambridge Cardiac Care Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdjunctRehabilitationHemodynamicsCardiac outputPhysical therapyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hypertension increases the risk of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, renal failure and stroke. Recent research has suggested that yoga has the potential to lower blood pressure (BP). Yoga is an exercise that involves deep breathing, relaxation and stretching exercises. Comparative studies of yoga versus its constituent parts; deep breathing, relaxation and stretching on HR, Pulse Pressure (PP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and BP are lacking. Methods: Sixty healthy volunteers were recruited from a cardiovascular prevention center. BP and HR were measured using 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitors at baseline and at three months. Individuals were randomized equally into a relaxation group, a stretching group, a deep breathing group and a yoga group who were taught their respective routines by the same cardiovascular kinesiologist. Participants were instructed to perform their prescribed 15-minute routine five times per week, twice of which were on site in a guided class. Results: There were no significant differences at baseline. There was no significant difference between baseline and after the 3-month intervention in the quiet relaxation group. The stretching group had a 4.5% (p<0.0001) reduction in systolic BP and saw similar reductions in diastolic BP, PP, MAP and HR. In the deep breathing group, it was found that after the intervention there was a 7.1% reduction in systolic BP (p<0.0001). Similar changes were found for diastolic BP, PP, MAP and HR. The yoga group was found to reduce systolic BP by 9.7% (p<0.0001) significantly more than stretching or relaxation groups but had no significant difference in comparison to deep breathing after the 3-month intervention. Similar results were found for diastolic BP, PP, MAP and HR. Conclusions: Quiet relaxation had minimal effects on all hemodynamic parameters assessed; deep breathing, stretching and yoga appeared to reduce BP, PP, MAP and HR. Yoga appeared to have significantly greater reductions than stretching and relaxation but had similar reductions as deep breathing. This suggests that deep breathing exercise may be a significant contributor to the anti-hypertensive benefits of yoga.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Health and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→