MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888807284 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v15i1.81

Hydrolysis Precipitation-assisted Solid-state Reaction to Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> and its Electrochemical Properties

2011· article· en· W2888807284 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jie Xu, Chunju Lv, Guanglei Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcinationSpinelElectrochemistryStoichiometryHydrolysisMaterials scienceLithium titanatePrecipitationLithium (medication)Phase (matter)OxideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryChemical engineeringNuclear chemistryLithium-ion batteryChemistryBattery (electricity)ElectrodePhysical chemistryCatalysisChromatographyMetallurgyThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinel lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12) materials were synthesized by a hydrolysis precipitation-assisted solid-state method in the temperature range from 600 to 900℃ for large-scale production. DSC/TGA, XRD and SEM were used to characterize the as-prepared samples. The optimum synthesis condition was examined in relation to the charge–discharge performance. It was found that when the dry hydrolysis precipitation precursor with 8% Li excess was calcined at 700–800℃ for 12 h in air, a pure Li4Ti5O12 phase was obtained. The as-obtained material has the best electrochemical performance due to its narrow size distribution and precise stoichiometry of the oxide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207