MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A qualidade da oferta de alimentação a celíacos: um estudo de caso no Rio Grande do Sul

2018· article· pt· W2888811799 on OpenAlex
Ana Marta Cavalheiro Kerber, Guilherme Bridi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFólio - Revista Científica Digital - Jornalismo Publicidade e Turismo · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
Canadian institutionsPrairie Women's Health Centre of Excellence
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesAgricultural sciencePhilosophyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho aborda questões associadas à qualidade da oferta a alimentação de pessoas com intolerância aoglúten. O objetivo deste estudo foi o de identificar de que forma os portadores de DC avaliam a oferta de restaurantespara sua restrição alimentar no tocante às variáveis: preço, qualidade e variedade dos pratos, confiabilidadedas informações e atendimento. A pesquisa foi aplicada através de formulário virtual com indivíduos pertencentesao Grupo do Facebook de uma Associação específica para este público. Após a aplicação do instrumento com osrespondentes, os dados levantados assinalam que a oferta de alimento sem glúten pelos restaurantes ainda é restrita,sendo que igualmente foi constatada a ocorrência de temor por parte dos portadores de DC pela contaminaçãocruzada, a partir da falta de preparo destes estabelecimentos para produzir pratos livres dessa contaminação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0170.005
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it