A qualidade da oferta de alimentação a celíacos: um estudo de caso no Rio Grande do Sul
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho aborda questões associadas à qualidade da oferta a alimentação de pessoas com intolerância aoglúten. O objetivo deste estudo foi o de identificar de que forma os portadores de DC avaliam a oferta de restaurantespara sua restrição alimentar no tocante às variáveis: preço, qualidade e variedade dos pratos, confiabilidadedas informações e atendimento. A pesquisa foi aplicada através de formulário virtual com indivíduos pertencentesao Grupo do Facebook de uma Associação específica para este público. Após a aplicação do instrumento com osrespondentes, os dados levantados assinalam que a oferta de alimento sem glúten pelos restaurantes ainda é restrita,sendo que igualmente foi constatada a ocorrência de temor por parte dos portadores de DC pela contaminaçãocruzada, a partir da falta de preparo destes estabelecimentos para produzir pratos livres dessa contaminação.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".