MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2888815375 · doi:10.1029/2018jd029008

Changes in the Isotopic Signature of Atmospheric Nitrous Oxide and Its Global Average Source During the Last Three Millennia

2018· article· en· W2888815375 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Prokopiou, Célia Sapart, J. Rosen, Peter Sperlich, Thomas Blunier, Edward J. Brook, Roderik S. W. van de Wal, Thomas Röckmann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Polar ResearchCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesKorea Polar Research InstituteAgence Nationale de la RechercheNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekIcelandic Centre for ResearchInstitut Polaire Français Paul Emile VictorChinese Academy of SciencesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAlfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine ResearchNatural Resources CanadaFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekOffice of Polar ProgramsFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNitrous oxideIsotopeAtmosphere (unit)Isotopic signatureEnvironmental chemistryGreenhouse gasChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceGeologyMeteorologyPhysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a strong greenhouse gas whose mole fraction in the atmosphere has increased over the industrial period. We present a new set of isotope measurements of N2O in air extracted from ice cores covering the last 3,000 years. For the preindustrial (PI) atmosphere, we find an average N2O mole fraction of (267 ± 1) nmol/mol and average tropospheric N2O isotopic values of δ15NavPI = (9.5 ± 0.1)‰, δ18OPI = (47.1 ± 0.2)‰, δ15NαPI = (17.8 ± 0.4)‰, and δ15ΝβPI = (1.2 ± 0.4)‰. From PI to modern times all isotope signatures decreased with a total change of δ15Nav = (−2.7 ± 0.2)‰, δ18O = (−2.5 ± 0.4)‰, δ15Nα = (−2.0 ± 0.7)‰, and δ15Νβ (−3.5 ± 0.7)‰. Interestingly, the temporal evolution is not the same for δ15Nav and δ18O. δ18O trends are relatively larger during the early part, and δ15Nav trends are larger during the late part of the industrial period, implying a decoupling of sources over the industrial period. Using a mass balance model, we determined the isotopic composition of the total average N2O source. Assuming that the total present source is the sum of a constant natural source and an increasing anthropogenic source, this anthropogenic source has an isotopic signature of δ15Navsource,anthrop = (−15.0 ± 2.6)‰, δ18Osource,anthrop = (30.0 ± 2.6)‰, δ15Nαsource,anthrop = (−4.5 ± 1.7)‰, and δ15Nβsource,anthrop = (−24.0 ± 8.4)‰. The 15N site preference of the source has increased since PI times, which is indicative of a relative shift from denitrification to nitrification sources, consistent with agricultural emissions playing a major role in the N2O increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicIsotope Analysis in Ecology→French-language works237,207→