Structural, Thermal and Electrical Conduction Studies on LiNiPO4: RE (RE= La, Nd) Prepared by Polyol Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LiNiPO4 and LiNiPO4: xRE (RE = La, Nd) (x = 0.01 mol%, 0.03 mol%, 0.05 mol%, 0.07 mol%, 0.09 mol%) samples have been prepared by polyol method using 1, 2 propanediol as a polyol medium. XRD patterns have indicated that the pristine LiNiPO4 is well crystallized with orthorhombic structure pnma space group and structurally stable compound upon doping of rare earth metals. Functional group analyses have been carried out by FTIR spectroscopic analysis. TG analysis shows that no weight loss has been observed above 600°C for both Nd3+ and La3+ doped LiNiPO4. The morphology of the samples was analyzed through Scanning Electron Microscopy. The conductivity of LiNiPO4 was found to be improved by 2 orders by doping of rare earth ions. It is found that lanthanum is an excellent dopant for LiNiPO4 than neodymium due to the formation of free ion sites which causes the enhancement of conductivity. Dielectric studies support that doping of La3+ is favorable for conduction compared with Nd3+ doping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".