MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2888907810 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v10n6p136

Effects of Biological and Non Biological Agents (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) on Bone Mineral Density in a Sample of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

2018· article· en· W2888907810 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed H. Alosami, Omar Farooq Al-Azzawi, Faiq I. Gorial, Israa Mohammed Redia

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisOsteoporosisBone mineralInternal medicineRheumatologyOsteopeniaRheumatismVitamin D and neurologyPhysical therapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is an extra-articular complication of rheuma­toid arthritis that results in increased risk of fractures and associated mor­bidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in bone mineral density in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on biological (anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha) and non-biological agent disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).PATIENTS & METHODS: A cross sectional study enrolled 60 RA patients diagnosed by rheumatologist according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (2010 ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for RA. Thirty patient on biological agent (anti TNF alpha) and 30 patient on non-biological agent (DMARD). RA disease-related data wincluded disease duration, disease activity score index of 28 joints (DAS 28) and clinical disease activity index (CDAI), functional class, body mass index and treatment history. vitamin D level were measured in both groups. Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of hip and lumber spines for patients. A T –score of equal or less than -2.5 standard deviation that of young healthy adults were taken as osteoporotic and scores between -1 to -2.5 standard deviation was taken as osteopenic.RESULTS: Prevalence of RA patients on biological agent (anti TNF alpha) who had osteoporosis was 1(3%) and 12(40%) were osteopenic, and in patients on non biological (DMARD), Osteoporosis was present in 8(26%) and osteopenia in 13(43%, p= 0.019).Vitamin D level in patient on biological agent (anti TNF alpha) was low in 24(80%) and normal in 6 (20%) patients. While in non biological agent (DMARD) it was low in 13(43.3%) and normal in 17(56.7%) of patients, p=0.003). Patients on biological agent (anti TNF alpha); 15 (50%) patients showed high calcium, 2(6.7%) low phosphorous, and 2(6.7%) high Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) while in patients on non biological agent the results were 10 patients( 33.3%) had high calcium, and 5(16.7%) had high ALP. There was a significant decrease in bone mineral density in RA patients on DMARDS while biological agent (anti TNF alpha) had a role in arrest bone loss in RA patients.CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong association between types of therapy and reduction of bone mineral density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health Science→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→