Nursing Homes Without Walls for Aging in Place
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Étant donné l’urgence de trouver des solutions innovantes et efficientes pour la prestation de services communautaires favorisant le «vieillir chez soi», il est nécessaire d’identifier de nouvelles solutions mettant à profit les infrastructures existantes. Dans la présente étude séquentielle à méthode mixte, nous avons exploré le rôle que les centres d’hébergement pour personnes âgées pourraient jouer dans l’offre de services destinés à une population cible non traditionnelle, soit les aînés avec pertes d’autonomie vivant dans la communauté. Quarante-deux (n=42) centres d’hébergement pour personnes âgées du Nouveau-Brunswick ont complété un sondage en ligne et 10 de ces établissements ont accepté d’accorder des entretiens. Les résultats montrent que 100 % des participants sont d’avis que les centres d’hébergement pourraient offrir des services aux personnes âgées dans la communauté afin de favoriser le vieillir chez soi. Les résultats suggèrent que les centres d’hébergement peuvent apporter des solutions efficientes et innovantes en ce sens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".