Тhe efficiency and safety of a dietary supplement used in the treatment of preschool and school children with acute respiratory infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. The aim of this research was to assess the efficiency and safety of a natural product N-acetylcysteine and propolis in the children with acute respiratory infections with increased mucus production and cough. Material and Methods. The research was conducted in the period April 2016 - February 2017 among 145 pediatric patients aged 3 to 14 years with symptoms of acute respiratory infection. They were divided into two groups. Group A - preschool and Group B - school children. The first clinical examination included demographic data, physical examination. filling out the quality of cough questionnaire, and taking nasal and pharyngeal swabs. After a ten-day therapy, physical examination was conducted, quality of cough questionnaire was refilled and swabs were taken. Results. Group A included 73 and Group B 72 children. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of respiratory disease episodes. In Group B children received antibiotics less often. started school at an early age and more children had daily activities in regard to children in Group A. Statistically, both groups of children coughed early in the morning more than during the day. The results of control swab tests were negative in both groups. No side effects were reported in either group. Conclusion. The propolis combined with N-acetylcysteine in a pediatric syrup is a good choice in the treatment of acute respiratory infections in children with accompanied mucus production and cough. The product is efficient and safe for all age groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".