The CLT in high dimensions: Quantitative bounds via martingale embedding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce a new method for obtaining quantitative convergence rates for the central limit theorem (CLT) in a high-dimensional setting. Using our method, we obtain several new bounds for convergence in transportation distance and entropy, and in particular: (a) We improve the best known bound, obtained by the third named author (Probab. Theory Related Fields 170 (2018) 821–845), for convergence in quadratic Wasserstein transportation distance for bounded random vectors; (b) we derive the first nonasymptotic convergence rate for the entropic CLT in arbitrary dimension, for general log-concave random vectors (this adds to (Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 55 (2019) 777–790), where a finite Fisher information is assumed); (c) we give an improved bound for convergence in transportation distance under a log-concavity assumption and improvements for both metrics under the assumption of strong log-concavity. Our method is based on martingale embeddings and specifically on the Skorokhod embedding constructed in (Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 52 (2016) 1259–1280).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.058 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".