Vibration Frequency Analysis of Beam–Ring Structure for Circular Deployable Truss Antenna
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The circular truss antenna of the large aperture is considered to be a flexible structure which may cause vibration in space and may affect its performance. The frequency analysis of the circular truss antenna is an important problem for understanding its vibration mechanism. In this paper, we investigate the frequency characteristics of a beam–ring structure which is proposed for the first time to model the circular truss antenna in the case of the antenna expended and locked. Based on describing the displacements of the beam–ring system in detail, the kinetic energy and potential energy are calculated. The partial differential governing equations of motion and boundary conditions for the beam–ring structure are derived by Hamilton principle. From the linear parts of the governing equations of motion and the corresponding boundary conditions, the linear frequencies of the beam–ring structure are theoretically obtained. The effects of the physical parameters on the frequency characteristics of the beam–ring structure are studied, which are further verified by the numerical results. The finding phenomena of this paper are helpful for designing and controlling the beam–ring structure such as the circular truss antenna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it