MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889213357 · doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00230

Incidence of Nerve Injury After Hip Arthroscopy

2018· article· en· W2889213357 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Kern, Ryan Murray, Thomas I. Sherman, William F. Postma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHip arthroscopyNerve injurySurgeryIncidence (geometry)Femoral nerveProspective cohort studyAnesthesiaArthroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Hip arthroscopy is a commonly performed procedure that carries a notable risk of nerve injury secondary to port placement and the use of axial traction. Sensory neurapraxia of the pudendal nerve and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is most common; however, sexual dysfunction and sciatic nerve injury has also been reported. Reported incidence of nerve injury ranges between 1.4% and 5% in the literature, but much of these data are based on unsolicited patient concerns. This study aimed to determine the true rate of nerve injury among this patient population through administration of a validated survey at multiple time points. METHODS: A prospective study of all patients undergoing hip arthroscopy requiring traction by a single surgeon at our institution was performed. These cases were the first 100 hip arthroscopies performed in practice by the surgeon. Before surgery, all patients were asked about the presence of neuropathic symptoms including sexual dysfunction through administration of a validated questionnaire. The same questionnaire was then administered at several time points postoperatively: on the day of surgery, on postoperative day 2, at the first follow-up visit, and if symptoms persisted, then at each follow-up appointment until resolution of the symptoms. Overall incidence of nerve injury was then calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate whether traction time, sex, body mass index (BMI), or technically demanding surgical skills affected the incidence. RESULTS: This study included a total of 100 patients with an average age of 29 (13 to 62) years and an average BMI of 25. Nerve injury was seen in 13 patients with an incidence of 13%. Specific nerves injured included the pudendal (9), lateral femoral cutaneous (2), sciatic (1), and superficial peroneal nerves (1). Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate a notable association between the risk of nerve injury and increased traction time, sex, or increased BMI. The technically demanding surgical skills was associated with a notable decrease in the traction time, but no notable difference in the risk of nerve injury was observed. Most nerve injuries resolved within 2 weeks (8 of 13), and all cases of nerve injury resolved within 9 months. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of nerve injury after hip arthroscopy may be markedly higher than previously reported; however, resolution seems to occur as previously found in the literature. Patients should be educated regarding the risk of nerve injury during this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207