MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889243823 · doi:10.18192/olbiwp.v9i0.2318

Student Motivation, Identity and Investment Construction in French Immersion Studies at the University of Ottawa

2018· article· en· W2889243823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOLBI Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrench immersionHumanitiesSociologyPedagogyPsychologyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis article focusses on the motivating factors behind the decision of first-year students in the French Immersion Studies (FIS) program at the University of Ottawa to continue their immersion studies at a university level, how they experience their studies within this program, and how this experience impacts their identity and investment in French language and culture. The findings presented are part of a study that demonstrates the positive influence that parents, teachers and relevant extracurricular experiences have on students’ decision to continue their immersion studies as well as the transformations of the students’ identity construction and investment which are enhanced through the FIS program, the bilingual environment which surrounds it, and students` activities.Keywords: motivation, identity, investment, French Immersion Studies RésuméCet article porte sur les facteurs qui ont motivé des étudiants en première année d’études à s’inscrire au programme du Régime d’Immersion Française (RIF) de l’Université d’Ottawa afin de poursuivre leurs études en immersion au niveau universitaire, leurs expériences dans ce programme ainsi que l’impact que ce programme a sur leur identité et investissement dans la langue et la culture françaises. Les résultats présentés font partie d’une étude qui montre l’influence positive des parents, enseignants, et expériences pertinentes hors programme sur la décision des étudiants de continuer leurs études en immersion ainsi que la transformation associée à leur construction identitaire à l’augmentation de leur investissement à la suite de participation dans le programme RIF, l’environnement bilingue qui l’environne et les activités des étudiants. Mots -clés : motivation, identité, investissement, Régime d’Immersion Française

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it