MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889302587 · doi:10.2196/11802

Automated Patient Navigation Platform Increases Referral Conversion for Surgical Consultations

2018· article· en· W2889302587 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aiden Feng, Josephine Elias, Kevin Hart, Philip Roberts, Karl Laskowski

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHealthcare Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferralScheduleMedicineMedical emergencyRevenueOperations managementNursingBusinessComputer scienceFinanceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Provider organizations often lack closed-loop systems to convert referrals for surgical consultations, relying on patients to proactively follow-up and schedule their initial evaluation with surgeons. Referrals that do not promptly converted into appointments result in delays in care and lost revenue opportunities. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an automated referral navigation platform on referral conversion rate and scheduling efficiency. Methods: Referral information, prompts to schedule appointments, and appointment reminders with digital wayfinding services were delivered to patients using time-released text messages and emails via an automated HIPAA-compliant software platform (Medumo, Inc, Boston, MA). All patients who were referred for evaluation by General Surgery, Oral Medicine, Otolaryngology, and Urology at our institution for 16 weeks starting February 12, 2018 were enrolled in the automated referral navigation program (intervention cohort). Exclusion criteria were incomplete referral information and absence of email address and cell phone number in the medical record. The primary outcome metric was conversion rate of referrals to appointments within 12 business days. Outcome metrics on scheduling efficiency included conversion rate of referrals to appointments within 2 business days and percent of patients contacted within 24 hours of referral. Success of patient navigation was measured with appointment no-show rates, digital wayfinding service utilization, and patient satisfaction. All outcomes of the intervention cohort were compared to referrals made in the 16 weeks ending February 11, 2018 (baseline cohort). Results: During the intervention period, there were 4991 patients enrolled in the referral navigation program. Compared to the baseline cohort, the conversion rate of referrals to appointments within 12 business days increased from 63.4% to 65.6% (P=.01). Efficiency with which referrals were converted to appointments improved: referral conversion rate within 2 business days increased from 40.0% to 52.0% (P<.01) and patient contact rate within 24 hours increased from 54.5% to 95.9% (P<.01). For appointments scheduled during the study period, no-show rate decreased 22.7% (5.7% to 4.4%, P=.01) and utilization of the digital hospital wayfinding service increased 1777.6%. Average satisfaction score was 4.4/5.0 for the referral navigation program. Conclusions: Implementation of a software platform that facilitates referral capture with appointment navigation increased referral conversion, boosted efficiency of appointment scheduling, and improved patient preparedness with fewer no-shows in surgical specialties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIproceedingsSame topicHealthcare Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207