MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889314183 · doi:10.1002/lsm.23014

Efficacy and safety of picosecond 755‐nm alexandrite laser with diffractive lens array for non‐ablative rejuvenation in Chinese skin

2018· article· en· W2889314183 on OpenAlexaff
Heidi Wat, Samantha Y N Shek, Chi K Yeung, Henry H. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueLasers in Surgery and Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoagingMedicineErythemaRejuvenationDermatologyPatient satisfactionAdverse effectWrinkleVisual analogue scaleSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The picosecond alexandrite laser with diffractive lens array (DLA) offers the dual advantages of a picosecond pulse duration and the fractionated delivery of laser energy. This study explores the efficacy and safety of the DLA for treatment of multiple aesthetic concerns associated with photoaging of the face including skin texture irregularities, dyspigmentation, enlarged pore size, rhytides, and skin laxity. METHODS: This prospective, evaluator-blinded trial enrolled Fitzpatrick skin type III-IV patients with mild to moderate signs of facial photoaging. Patients received six full face treatments at 4 week intervals for a total of 107 treatments. Standardized photography was obtained at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 month follow-up visits. Two independent blinded evaluators rated each of the five signs of photoaging on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) at each follow-up visit compared to baseline. A global aesthetic improvement score was also assigned at each follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included patient-rated pain and heat sensation on a 10-point VAS, and overall satisfaction. Adverse events were noted after each treatment and at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: A total of 18 Chinese patients age 35-59 completed the study. A statistically significant improvement in skin texture and dyspigmentation scores was noted at the 1 month follow-up that was sustained at 3 months. No significant improvements wer--e observed in pore size, rhytides, or skin laxity. The mean pain score was 5.1 ± 2 and mean heat sensation was 3.6 ± 2.1. Expected transient erythema and edema occurred in 95.3% (102/107) and 1.9% (2/108) of treatments, respectively, and resolved in hours. No incidences of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) were noted at the 1, 2, and 3 month visits. CONCLUSION: The 755-nm picosecond laser with DLA is a safe and effective non-ablative modality for targeting facial skin texture irregularities and dyspigmentation in Chinese skin. Patients tolerated the treatment well with adverse effects limited to transient erythema and edema. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:8-13, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLasers in Surgery and MedicineSame topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207