Sinecatechins ointment for the treatment of warts in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sinecatechins ointment, a green tea derivative, is a novel agent approved for the treatment of anogenital warts in immunocompetent adults and has been reported to be effective in treating extragenital warts as well. Data are lacking in children. We sought to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sinecatechins ointment for treating warts in children. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of children with anogenital and/or extragenital warts treated with sinecatechins ointment for at least 1 month. The primary outcome was frequency of complete response (total resolution of warts at follow-up). Secondary outcomes included frequency of partial response (reduction in number and/or size of warts) and adverse events. There was no control group for comparison. RESULTS: Of 24 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 14 (58.3%) had anogenital warts, 7 (29.2%) had extragenital warts, and 3 (12.5%) had both anogenital and extragenital warts. Mean age at treatment initiation was 8.0 years (SD = 3.9). Median duration of warts at treatment initiation was 1.2 years (range 0.09-12.62). Sixteen patients (66.7%) experienced a reduction in the number and/or size of the warts. Four patients (16.7%) had complete resolution. Median treatment duration was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.8) overall. Median time to complete resolution was 2.9 months (range 1.3-7.7). Fifty-four percent of patients used sinecatechins ointment as prescribed. Adverse events were limited to mild local irritation (7 patients; 29.2%). CONCLUSION: Sinecatechins ointment is a promising therapy for warts in children, and its use should be evaluated in prospective controlled clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".