MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889319417 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2018.8447736

An Energy-Efficient Cache Architecture for Chip-Multiprocessors Based on Non-Uniformity Accesses

2018· article· en· W2889319417 on OpenAlexaff
Pooneh Safayenikoo, Arghavan Asad, Farah Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheParallel computingCache-only memory architectureEmbedded systemParsecSystem on a chipEnergy consumptionChipCache algorithmsEfficient energy useMemory architectureCPU cacheComputer architectureCache coloringEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With technology scaling and increasing parallelism levels of new embedded applications, number of cores in chip-multiprocessors (CMPs) has been shifted from 100 to 1000 cores. To efficiently store and manipulate of large amount of data in future applications and, also, decreasing the gap between cores and off-chip memory accesses, the size of cache systems in CMPs has been dramatically increased. Since on-chip storage systems, particularly last level caches, occupy as much as 50% of the chip area, they are dominant leakage power consumer in future multi/many-core systems. In this context, power consumption becomes a primary concern in future CMPs because many of them are generally limited by battery lifetime. For future CMPs architecting, 3D stacking of last level caches (LLCs) has been recently introduced as a new methodology to combat to performance challenges of 2D integration and memory wall. However, the 3D design of LLCs incurs more leakage energy consumption compared to conventional cache architectures in 2Ds due to dense integration. In this paper, we use the non-uniform distribution of the accesses in banks of LLCs to decrease leakage energy. We propose a runtime cache architecture. The proposed architecture that is based on nonuniform cache architectures (NUCA) disables cache banks that have low accesses and leads to high energy-efficiency. The experimental results show that the proposed method improves energy-delay product by about 41% on average under PARSEC benchmarks compared to a recent technique named EECache.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207