MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P5459MR-proANP and NT-proBNP as specific indicators of procedural success in patients with severe mitral regurgitation undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair (MitraClip)

2018· article· en· W2889343802 on OpenAlexaff
Oliver Doerr, C Walther, Christoph Liebetrau, Till Keller, L Holtkamp, Niklas Boeder, Matthias Bayer, Pascal Bauer, H. Moellmann, Luise Gaede, Christian Troidl, Sandra Voss, Timm Bauer, Christian W. Hamm, Holger Nef

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitraClipMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyMitral regurgitationMitral valvePercutaneousMitral valve regurgitationFunctional mitral regurgitationHeart failureEjection fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) is an interventional treatment option in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who have a high risk for open-heart surgery. Although PMVR is safe and feasible, there is currently limited information on predictors of clinical outcome and procedural success after the MitraClip procedure. Severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is associated with left atrial (LA) and ventricular (LV) pressure and volume overload that can lead to aggravation of heart failure and dyspnea. Elevated blood levels of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were consistently found to be associated with atrial and ventricular volume overload in patients with severe MR. The aim of the present study was to examine the diagnostic value of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP as specific indicators of therapeutic success in high-risk patients undergoing PMVR using the MitraClip system. Methods: A total of 120 consecutive patients (age: 77.4 yrs [±7.5] years) undergoing PMVR were included in this study. PMVR was performed according to standard clinical practice using the MitraClip® system. Procedural success was defined as a reduction of MR by ≥2 grades after PMVR. Venous blood samples were collected for biomarker analysis prior to and 24 h after PMVR. Samples were processed immediately and frozen at -80 °C until assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→