Clinical Responses and Synovial Vascularity in Obese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Adalimumab and Methotrexate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Obese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) report more joint swelling and tenderness and often have poorer responses to therapy than nonobese patients. The aim of this posthoc analysis of the MUSICA trial was to compare imaging and clinical disease activity measures in obese and nonobese patients with RA. METHODS: MUSICA evaluated methotrexate (MTX) 20 mg/week versus 7.5 mg/week in combination with adalimumab (ADA) in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX. Patients were categorized by baseline body mass index as normal (< 25), overweight (≥ 25 to < 30), or obese (≥ 30). Synovial vascularity and hypertrophy, swollen and tender joint counts (SJC and TJC), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses, and low disease activity (LDA), defined as Clinical Disease Activity Index < 10 and 28-joint count Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) < 3.2, were assessed at weeks 12 and 24. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar among groups at baseline. Obese patients had numerically smaller changes from baseline to weeks 12/24 in SJC, TJC, DAS28-CRP, and synovial hypertrophy and vascularity versus nonobese patients. Significantly fewer obese patients reached ACR20/50 at weeks 12 and 24, and LDA at Week 12; this difference was especially apparent in patients receiving 7.5 mg/week MTX but was no longer significant at Week 24. CONCLUSION: Obese patients with RA had worse clinical and ultrasonographic responses than nonobese patients, which were partly overcome with time. Obese patients may experience better and faster clinical improvements if ADA is initiated with high-dose (20 mg/week) rather than low-dose MTX. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01185288].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".