MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889401277 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2018.8450431

Enhancing Signal Strength and ISI-Avoidance of Diffusion-based Molecular Communication

2018· article· en· W2889401277 on OpenAlexaff
Oussama Abderrahmane Dambri, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular communicationSIGNAL (programming language)Impulse (physics)Computer scienceInterference (communication)TransmitterChannel (broadcasting)Degradation (telecommunications)Biological systemMaterials scienceChemistryPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffusion-based Molecular Communication is a bioinspired system, which uses random walk diffusive molecules as carriers of the information between the transmitter and the receiver. One of the main challenges of that system is the Inter-Symbol-Interference (ISI), caused by the channel memory and represented by a heavy tail in the impulse response. While most prior work has proposed the use of enzymes to catalyze the degradation of the remaining molecules, which mitigates ISI and increases the data rate, the enzymes will decrease the signal strength by degrading also the molecules carrying the information. In this paper, we propose the use of non-enzymatic reactions to degrade only the received molecules, which increases the amplitude of the received signal and at the same time mitigates ISI, enhancing by that the signal strength and the achievable throughput. In this study, we focused on photolysis reactions, which use light to instantly degrade the molecules. We studied the optimal time of light emission with 3D stochastic simulations, using AcCoRD simulator. Simulation results show an improvement of the received signal when using non-enzymatic reactions, compared to enzymatic systems. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated using interference-to-total-received molecules (ITR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207