MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889412507 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-03-840702

SCID genotype and 6-month posttransplant CD4 count predict survival and immune recovery

2018· article· en· W2889412507 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaBC Children's HospitalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of ManitobaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsSevere combined immunodeficiencyMedicineImmune systemTransplantationInternal medicineImmunosuppressionHematopoietic stem cell transplantationGenotypeSurvival analysisImmunologyRegimenOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points The genetic cause of SCID impacts on survival and immune reconstitution and should be considered in tailoring HCT for individual patients. Total and naive CD4+ cell counts in SCID patients 6 and 12 months post-HCT predict long-term survival and sustained immune reconstitution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it