Indium Recovery from Waste Liquid Crystal Display via Chloride Volatilization Process: Thermodynamic Computation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increase of the scrap liquid crystal displays (LCDs), recycling indium from waste LCDs has captured an international attention. Chloride metallurgy is a promising method for indium recovery from LCD panels, due to the lower boiling point of indium chloride. In the present study, thermodynamic analyses of indium recovery from waste LCDs via chloride volatilization process by the HSC Chemistry software was carried out to understand the reaction mechanism between chlorinating agent and LCDs to avoid adverse factors, and simultaneously obtain the optimal conditions for the extraction of indium. The results show that the recovered indium from LCDs with HCl o as the chlorinating agent from the PVC pyrolysis is feasible, with the chlorination temperature controlled between 134.49 and 554.25 C, o and the evaporation temperature higher than 490 C, and simultaneously, the oxygen partial pressure controlled or under anaerobic conditions. As such, the influences of SiO , Al O and Fe O , contained in LCDs, can be ignored or avoided, and only CaO, K O and Na O 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 would consume partial pressure of HCl gas, reducing the indium recovery reaction rate. The present study might provide important inspiration for indium recovery from waste LCDs via chloride volatilization process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it