MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889449163 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2018-0218

Enhanced light absorption in simulations of ultra-thin ZnO layers structured by a SiO<sub>2</sub> photonic glass

2018· article· en· W2889449163 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert H. Coridan, Mya A. Norman, Hamed Mehrabi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhotonic crystalAbsorption (acoustics)SemiconductorOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceThin filmColloidal crystalBand gapPhotonicsNanometreCoatingCrystal (programming language)NanotechnologyColloidChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hierarchically organized nanostructures are often employed to improve the energy conversion efficiency of photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical cells. Ultra-thin semiconductors can improve the internal carrier collection yield in materials with poor carrier lifetimes by reducing the characteristic length scales of collection. However, reducing the dimension of the light absorber requires strategies to increase absorption and the overall photogeneration when the material is to be used in broadband solar energy conversion applications. Here, we explore a strategy for improving light absorption in nanometer-scale, ultra-thin film ZnO layers by integrating them into a SiO 2 colloidal crystal-based photonic glass. We use three-dimensional finite-difference electromagnetic simulations to study the local and total absorption improvements on composite films of close-packed, randomized colloidal structures coated with a thin layer of ZnO. These simulations show that the near band-gap absorption in the ZnO coating is dependent on the degree of vacancies in the colloidal crystal that templates the photonic glass. With these results, we show that disordered, defective colloidal composites can potentially be used to fabricate nanostructured photoelectrodes based on ultra-thin semiconductor layers with improved light absorption characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207