Lateral Ventricle Enlargement and Cortical Thinning in Idiopathic Normal-pressure Hydrocephalus Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We utilized three-dimensional, surface-based, morphometric analysis to investigate ventricle shape between 2 groups: (1) idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) patients who had a positive response to the cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSFTT) and (2) healthy controls. The aims were (1) to evaluate the location of INPH-related structural abnormalities of the lateral ventricles and (2) to investigate relationships between lateral ventricular enlargement and cortical thinning in INPH patients. Thirty-three INPH patients and 23 healthy controls were included in this study. We used sparse canonical correlation analysis to show correlated regions of ventricular surface expansion and cortical thinning. Significant surface expansion in the INPH group was observed mainly in clusters bilaterally located in the superior portion of the lateral ventricles, adjacent to the high convexity of the frontal and parietal regions. INPH patients showed a significant bilateral expansion of both the temporal horns of the lateral ventricles and the medial aspects of the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles to surrounding brain regions, including the medial frontal lobe. Ventricular surface expansion was associated with cortical thinning in the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, bilateral rostral anterior cingulate cortex, left parahippocampal cortex, left temporal pole, right insula, right inferior temporal cortex, and right fusiform gyrus. These results suggest that patients with INPH have unique patterns of ventricular surface expansion. Our findings encourage future studies to elucidate the underlying mechanism of lateral ventricular morphometric abnormalities in INPH patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".