MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Breast Cancer Weight Loss (BWEL) trial: Randomized phase III trial evaluating the role of weight loss in adjuvant treatment of overweight and obese women with early-stage breast cancer (Alliance A011401).

2018· article· en· W2889659866 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer A. Ligibel, William T. Barry, Catherine M. Alfano, Dawn L. Hershman, Melinda L. Irwin, Marian L. Neuhouser, Cynthia A. Thomson, Linda M. Delahanty, Elizabeth S. Frank, Patricia A. Spears, Electra D. Paskett, Judith O. Hopkins, Vanessa Bernstein, Vered Stearns, Julia White, Thomas A. Wadden, Pamela J. Goodwin, Lisa A. Carey, Ann H. Partridge, Eric P. Winer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerOverweightWeight lossCancerHazard ratioInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialBody mass indexOncologyObesityConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS598 Background: Obesity is a growing health problem in the Unites States and around the world. Excess body weight has been linked to both an increased risk of developing breast cancer and poor prognosis in women diagnosed with early stage disease. A recent meta-analysis of 82 studies demonstrated that risk of breast cancer mortality was increased by 35% in women who were obese at the time of breast cancer diagnosis compared to women who were of normal weight. The Breast cancer Weight Loss (BWEL) study will evaluate the effect of weight loss after breast cancer diagnosis on risk of cancer recurrence. Methods: BWEL is a Phase III randomized trial evaluating the impact of a telephone-based weight loss intervention vs control on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in 3136 overweight and obese women with Stage II-III breast cancer. Eligibility criteria include diagnosis of hormone receptor positive or triple negative breast cancer within the preceding 12 months, body mass index of ≥27kg/m2, and completion of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation (if administered). Participants are randomized to a 2-year telephone- and mail-based weight loss intervention, adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program, plus a health education program or to a health education alone control group. The study has 85% power, using a one-sided Type I error rate of 0.025, to detect a hazard ratio of 0.80 between groups. This equates to a 4.1% absolute reduction in iDFS events in the intervention group vs. controls. Secondary aims will evaluate the impact of the weight loss intervention upon overall survival, weight and body composition, and patient-reported outcomes. Fasting blood is collected serially over time, and tissue samples of malignant and benign breast tissue are collected at baseline to provide insight into the biologic mechanisms linking obesity and breast cancer. BWEL opened in September 2016. To date, 1015 patients have been randomized and more than 1100 sites in the US and Canada have activated the trial. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180820, U10CA180868, U10CA077202. Clinical trial information: NCT02750826.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207