Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the eighth post-O2 release of PyCBC for analysis of data taken during Advanced LIGO's second observing run and Advanced Virgo's first observing run. This release is identical to the 1.9.3, except that it contains https://github.com/ligo-cbc/pycbc/commit/2557bb573c1b46fb926fbfa1345545dd15ef72ea that fixes the bad <code>setup.py</code> file in v1.9.3. This release has been tested against LALSuite with the hash: 8cbd1b7187ce3ed9a825d6ed11cc432f3cfde9a5 This provides functionality to provide a windowing function to apply to data segments before PSD estimation. Details of the changes since the 1.9.2 release are at https://github.com/ligo-cbc/pycbc/compare/v1.9.2..v1.9.4 A Docker container for this release is available from the pycbc/pycbc-el7 repository on Docker Hub and can be downloaded using the command: <pre><code>docker pull pycbc/pycbc-el7:v1.9.4 </code></pre> On a machine with CVMFS installed, a pre-built virtual environment is available for Red Hat 7 compatible operating systems by running the command: <pre><code>source /cvmfs/oasis.opensciencegrid.org/ligo/sw/pycbc/x86_64_rhel_7/virtualenv/pycbc-v1.9.4/bin/activate </code></pre> and for Debian 8 compatible operating systems by running the command: <pre><code>source /cvmfs/oasis.opensciencegrid.org/ligo/sw/pycbc/x86_64_deb_8/virtualenv/pycbc-v1.9.4/bin/activate </code></pre> A bundled <code>pycbc_inspiral</code> executable for use on the Open Science Grid is available at <pre><code>/cvmfs/oasis.opensciencegrid.org/ligo/sw/pycbc/x86_64_rhel_6/bundle/v1.9.4/pycbc_inspiral </code></pre>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it