Chronic Migraine – Evolution of the Concept and Clinical Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current definition of chronic migraine is relatively new. This definition has been field tested multiple times and has gone through multiple revisions. The evolution of the concept of migraine and its transformation to involve the category of chronic migraine is outlined. DISCUSSION: Chronic migraine as a disease was initially recognized in patients seen in headache clinics with a large burden of disability from frequent headaches and a history of prior migraines. Over time, this observation was operationalized into multiple diagnostic criteria with requirements for frequent headache days, typically 15 or more, and additionally a certain predisposition to migraine phenotype whether counted in number of headaches with migrainous features or a transformation from migraine in certain diagnostic criteria. In addition, the observation of medication overuse in this population raises a valid question - whether this is a factor for chronification versus a separate secondary headache etiology. CONCLUSION: Chronic migraine is a relatively newly recognized disease. We have an increasing number of medications studied specifically in chronic migraines, and these are briefly introduced. Additionally, there are guidelines to help design trials in chronic migraine. A valid future research question is to further study the efficacy of the medications studied in an undifferentiated migraine population, as there is economic pressure to use these medications as first line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".