MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mirvetuximab soravtansine (IMGN853), a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients (pts): Activity and safety analyses in phase I pooled expansion cohorts.

2017· article· en· W2889751375 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen N. Moore, Ursula A. Matulonis, David M. O’Malley, Jason Konner, Lainie P. Martin, Raymond P. Perez, Todd M. Bauer, Lucy Gilbert, Shelly Seward, Amit M. Oza, Rodrigo Ruiz-Soto, Michael J. Birrer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectOvarian cancerPopulationFolate receptorOncologyNauseaPhases of clinical researchDosingClinical trialCancerGastroenterologyCancer cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5547 Background: The early clinical evaluation of mirvetuximab soravtansine (IMGN853), an ADC that comprises a FRα-binding antibody linked to the tubulin-disrupting maytansinoid DM4, has revealed encouraging signs of activity in pts with ovarian cancer. A pooled analysis of safety and efficacy was performed including individuals with platinum-resistant EOC, enrolled across three expansion cohorts of an ongoing phase I trial (NCT01609556), who met the eligibility criteria for the pivotal phase III study of IMGN853 (FORWARD I; NCT02631876). Methods: Pts were administered IMGN853 intravenously once every 3 weeks at 6 mg/kg using adjusted ideal body weight dosing. Responses were assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and adverse events (AEs) evaluated by CTCAE v4.0. Results: A total of 37 EOC pts treated as part of the three phase I expansion cohorts (pooled population; n = 113) met the FORWARD I enrollment criteria of moderate to high tumor FRα levels (≥ 50% of cells with ≥ 2+ FRα expression) and 1-3 prior lines of therapy. In this group of pts with platinum-resistant disease, confirmed objective tumor responses were observed in 17 individuals (1 complete response [CR] and 16 partial responses [PR]) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 46% (95% CI, 29.5, 63.1) and a median PFS of 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.1, 9.0). The safety profile of the pooled population was consistent with that previously reported (ASCO Annual Meeting, 2016) with the most common AEs being diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and blurred vision; these were low grade and readily managed. Conclusions: IMGN853 continues to be characterized by favorable tolerability and encouraging activity in pts with platinum-resistant EOC. In particular, both the ORR (46%) and PFS (6.7 months) achieved in this group of pts are superior to outcomes typically seen with established single-agent chemotherapy within the setting of primary platinum resistance. Overall, these analyses provide continued, robust support for the patient eligibility strategy employed in the phase III evaluation of IMGN853. Clinical trial information: NCT01609556.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→