MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889786056 · doi:10.1063/1.5030741

Digital interference microscopy and density reconstruction of picosecond infrared laser desorption at the water-air interface

2018· article· en· W2889786056 on OpenAlexaff
Frederik Busse, Sebastian Kruber, Wesley D. Robertson, R. J. Dwayne Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research CouncilMax-Planck-Gesellschaft
KeywordsLaserMaterials scienceAblationOpticsLaser ablationShock waveAbsorption (acoustics)InfraredMicroscopeFar-infrared laserPulse durationMicroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Material ablation and evaporation using pulsed infrared lasers pose promising approaches for matrix-free laser desorption ionization and in laser surgery. For the best results, key parameters such as laser wavelength, pulse duration, and pulse energy need to be carefully adjusted to the application. We characterize the dynamics at the water-air interface induced by a 10 ps infrared laser tuned to the water absorption band at 3 μm, a parameter set facilitating stress confined desorption for typical absorption depths in biological samples and tissue. By driving the ablation faster than nucleation growth, cavitation induced sample damage during the ablation process can be mitigated. The resultant explosive ablation process leads to a shock front expansion and material ejection which we capture using off-axis digital interference microscopy, an interference technique particularly useful for detecting the phase shift caused by transparent objects. It is demonstrated that the method can yield local density information of the observed shock front with a single image acquisition as compared to the usually performed fit of the velocity extracted from several consecutive snapshots. We determine the ablation threshold to be (0.5±0.2) J cm−2 and observe a significant distortion of the central parts of the primary shock wave above approximately 2.5 J cm−2. The differences in plume shape observed for higher fluences are reflected in an analysis based on shock wave theory, which shows a very fast initial expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207