MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889810020 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.633

Mortality among single fathers as compared with single mothers and partnered fathers: a cohort study

2018· article· en· W2889810020 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maria Chiu, Farah Rahman, Simone N. Vigod, Cindy Lau, John Cairney, Paul Kurdyak

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWomen's College HospitalCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHazard ratioDemographySingle mothersMedicineProportional hazards modelCohortPopulationSingle parentCohort studyEnvironmental healthPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionSingle-parent families are becoming increasingly common around the world with a particularly steep rise in households headed by single fathers. Research suggests that single parenthood is associated with adverse outcomes, however, little is known about the health profile or risk of death of single fathers compared to other parents.
 Objectives and ApproachWe aimed to examine mortality risk in single fathers compared to single mothers and partnered parents, which is the first head-to-head comparison of single and partnered parent groups. Our population consisted of 871 single fathers, 4590 single mothers, 16,341 partnered fathers and 18,688 partnered mothers. We combined cross-sectional samples derived from the Ontario component of Statistics Canada’s Canadian Community Health Survey (2001 to 2012) linked to health administrative databases to identify medical conditions, health service use, all-cause mortality and cause of death. We investigated differences in mortality using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle and clinical factors.
 ResultsEach family group was followed up for a median of 11.10 years (IQR 7.36–13.54). Single fathers had a poor risk profile, particularly among lifestyle factors, such as low fruit and vegetable consumption and alcohol consumption. The mortality rate was three-fold higher for single fathers compared to single mothers and partnered fathers (5.81, 1.74 and 1.94, respectively). Even after adjustment, single fathers had a significantly higher risk of death compared to both single mothers (hazard ratio (HR): 2.49 (95% CI: 1.20 – 5.15, p=0.01)) and partnered fathers (HR: 2.06 (95% CI: 1.11 – 3.83, p=0.02). Small sample sizes precluded us from identifying the leading cause of death for single fathers.
 Conclusion/ImplicationsWe found that single fathers had the least favorable risk factor profile and greatest risk of mortality, which may be mitigated by physician intervention. Our study highlights that through cross-sectoral data linkages we can further advance our knowledge of social factors and their profound effects on health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207